Spoilers

The one thing I hate about the Internet, and I mean the only thing that I truly hate, is that games are spoiled before they are even released.

I wanted to play The Last of Us just because of the name. The box art and the title said it all as to what it would be, I was looking forward to finding out the world without knowing anything about the game aside from the setting.

Now I know that this isn't a huge deal, but to me the first 15 minutes is what makes or breaks the game for me. If I can get immersed within the first hour, I will love the game. It's happened with praised games like Bioshock and Gears of War, to not-so-praised games like Sudeki.

Sudeki averages a score of 7/10, nothing spectacular neither terrible. Just so happens to be my favorite game ever. No joke, as of July 5th 2013, Sudeki tops my favorite list. I knew nothing about the game, got immersed into the world and I almost feel like playing it again just by speaking of it.

I'm going on this tangent because it really gets on my nerves, and kinda depresses me because YouTube channels, forums, etc. that aren't even news outlets, video game or otherwise, spoil little details that completely ruin the experience for me before the games are even released.

Before Mass Effect 3 was even announced, the 'huge spoiler' was released. I knew that spoiler for a couple years before I eventually played Mass Effect 3. Knowing dampened the experience for me, because it was already known.

It's almost like the Game of Thrones episode "Red Wedding;" I knew it was going to happen, from previous spoilers. However, the experience was still there because I didn't know when it was going to happen.

I have a huge stick up my ass for things like this, I get that it's a bit obnoxious for me to go all "woe is me" for such a trivial thing. But to me, this completely kills the experience, and I'm just pissed off that I can't even go to Youtube without having a piece of a game, that I have yet to play, spoiled.

But hey, I'm just a fat, white, 18-25, (North) American, cynical, skeptical, Atheist. I'm hated by pretty much everyone.

[/rant]

Gun Control.

So... gun control.

A Smith & Wesson M&P 15 is perfectly legal to use. You can go and pick one up, go through the necessary steps and boom you have an assault rifle. Is this necessary?  For protection, you don't need anything more than a handgun.  For hunting, nothing more then a generic rifle.

I couldn't give less of a shit towards either side, really, but the arguments for weapons always tend to be half assed.

"We lose our rights as citizens," bullshit, you keep those rights only with enhanced security so you can keep those rights instead of lose them completely. It's like bitching because you have to go to bed 1 hour earlier.

"Knives, cars, etc. do the same thing, they should be banned too."
Everything potentially fatal, sans guns, have alternative uses. Without vehicles, today wouldn't exist as it is. In fact, you'd be blaming oxen, or whatever. Most vehicular homicides are caused by accidents, someone hitting a patch of black ice, their brakes giving out, use your imagination. Shit happens.

Knives, you got me there. Aside from the fact that you can't exactly slaughter a crowd in under 10 seconds with a knife.

"Not all people are crazy, some people use them responsibly."
Love to see you singing that tune when your family gets killed by someone who can't handle the gun properly. However, if guns are so accessible, you don't need me to finish that sentence.

Assume everyone with the ability to operate both their hands and feet had the permission to drive freely. That's right, without a license. See all the shit heads that can't drive worth a damn already? Imagine that amount if anyone could drive.

Don't assume I'm wrong because I'm not on your side. Think about it. Your cousin, who you grew up with, got gunned down by some asshole who had a bad day. Turns out, he has anger issues. Severe. One time he beat some guy into a nice thin paste because he got "insulted" by a gentle ribbing.

Your fiance? Man, you lucked out. Without exaggerating, she's easily a 10. She's also a doctor, a genius even. 2 weeks till the big day. However, one night some guy kills her because he has issues with paranoia. Turns out, he has schizophrenia. But she didn't know that, and he didn't know that she was harmless. Oh well, gotta protect your rights!

Isolated cases aside, jesus fucking christ smarten up. Your guns aren't going anywhere, your man-in-a-cannons will just require you to be a certain degree of sane.

...that is if you guys didn't bitch and moan to your representatives.

28 ___ LATER IS ARE NOT ZOMBIE MOVIES.

Calling 28 days/weeks later a zombie movie is like calling a bagel toast. They're not the same at fucking all. It's a super disease movie, but barely.  They don't get bit, turn into a slow, murmuring cannible; they turn into running, yelling, screaming, bloodthirsty savages after being infected with the disease via blood/saliva.

Sure you could argue that zombies are superdisease movies also, or that this is just a new way to write a zombie.

But you wouldn't consider Twilight's rendition of werewolves and vampires to be werewolves and vampires, would you?

Anti-racists are just as bad as racists.

Both sides descriminate and two wrongs don't make a right.

That is fucking all.  Shut your mouths.

Racism.

The true racists, are the people that believe racism is a real thing.

Let me explain.

WE ARE ALL HUMAN. 

Being racist is essentially hating on separate groups of human beings.  I don't think there are denominations of Humans, we're all Human, stick with that.  The second you make groups, you have to make one lesser than the other. You can't say they're all equal, that's redundant. They're equal, they're the same, they're Human.  Doesn't matter if you're black, that's descriptive; you're Human.  Doesn't matter if you're yellow, red, brown, whatever; you're human. That's descriptive.   If you label and list details of what a person is, bringing in denominations of what is (in this case... you know,) you have to bring in what's so different between them and the others.

That's where the racial hate comes into play.  Different people, different looks, different cultures, different everything.  You consider someone to be of African decent opposed to simply Human, you just unleashed a swarm of hate.  At this point, it's beyond repair.

Humanity fucked up the second we came into this evolutionary stage.  Essentially, when we became what we are, we fucked up then and there.  We don't see other animals label and attacked each other because of the color of their fur, why are we attaching labels to each other?


I'm a fat, teenaged, caucasian, hateful, cynical, atheist, American (not from the USA American,) and I believe my opinions are fact.  I'm all that is wrong with the world.  But god damn, why are people so fucking stupid?

Far too few intellectuals in the world.

As far as intellectuals go, I refer you to these definitions:

*appealing to or engaging the intellect: intellectual pursuits.

and

*characterized by or suggesting a predominance of intellect: an intellectual way of speaking.
Anyway, I seek out intellectual conversationalists, seemingly always set to fail. I like debating, discussing and arguing.  It makes me happy if the person I'm talking to isn't a complete idiot.  I like learning, or sharing what I learned.  If I win a debate, discussion or argument, I feel good.  If I lose? I feel good.  I love it, I like learning.  I'm a high school dropout, can't stand school in fact, but I love losing. Grade 8 graduate, by the by.

Back to the point, I don't like repetition.  Call it the most common OCD trait, I just don't.  Every now and then, I'll use another word.  For this instance, I used irregardless. Redundant, yes. I used it anyway, because I like throwing in a different word, that no one uses, every now and then.  I get called out, and in that call out it was implied that I was an idiot.

Using words that others do not, makes me an idiot.  Never gave me a reason why I was either, just insinuates that I am an idiot.

Chances are I misused insinuate, much why I like being an intellectual. Doesn't make me a cunt to my own mistakes.

Fake tits.

Oh my god.  Why do women do this to themselves? 

Insecurity?  Honestly, if you're unhappy with the size of your tits, you'd rather have ugly, misshapen ones?  Physical lust is a huge part for guys, if you're married and you do this without consulting your Husband you'll really shake the relationship. 

It's your choice, of course, but this isn't a small choice to make.  A guy will still love you, but it's harder to fully in love with someone when you aren't physically attracted to them.  That's all part of the commitment. I wouldn't know you say, but I couldn't picture myself falling in love with a beautiful, physically attractive, smart girl and then 20+ years down the line, she drops the first 2 and is only smart.  I'd have a hard time having the same connection I had when she was attractive in both elements.

But back to the subject at hand.  Fucking christ, 'Breast Enhancements' are not a good thing.  Some people like them, but honestly it's not a good thing at all.  It ruins the natural beauty of a woman, for one.  Two, that money you spent?  Could've gone to something better. Three, if you're self-esteem is low and you want to get a boob job, you're not helping at all.  You may feel better, but you look worse.

Unless if you happen to be the 0.0001% of women to receive these surgeries.  Fucking waste of money, ruins your beauty and shows how well you think of yourself. Men like confidence as well, if you get fake tits, there's 3 points deducted off of your score.